<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Information Grazing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://insidework.net/resources/articles/entry-0000012688/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://insidework.net/resources/articles/entry-0000012688</link>
	<description>faith and the bible at work and business for leading and innovating in a global economy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 11:33:24 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Glynn</title>
		<link>http://insidework.net/resources/articles/entry-0000012688/comment-page-1#comment-4511</link>
		<dc:creator>Glynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidework.net/resources/articles/entry-0000012688#comment-4511</guid>
		<description>Grazing what&#039;s available is vastly bigger than a full-time job. I think most of us simply adapt. I lean to the ruthless side as to what ends up in my RSS feed. There are a few sites -- fewer than 10 -- I visit daily (Inside Work is one of them). For news I lean to the Wall Street Journal (print and online). I watch very little television news. 

My RSS feed may be the most revealing. I categorize blogs by simple titles -- work, faith, writing, social media, etc. -- and I hold the list tightly. When I start losing interest in a particular area, I cull down the list.

I like Barth&#039;s advice for Christians, except I, too, wouldn&#039;t include the NY Times. The bible is supplmented by writings online and certain books. 

But while active management of the information sources helps, it still doesn&#039;t solve the larger problem. And I think the larger problem is here to stay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grazing what&#8217;s available is vastly bigger than a full-time job. I think most of us simply adapt. I lean to the ruthless side as to what ends up in my RSS feed. There are a few sites &#8212; fewer than 10 &#8212; I visit daily (Inside Work is one of them). For news I lean to the Wall Street Journal (print and online). I watch very little television news. </p>
<p>My RSS feed may be the most revealing. I categorize blogs by simple titles &#8212; work, faith, writing, social media, etc. &#8212; and I hold the list tightly. When I start losing interest in a particular area, I cull down the list.</p>
<p>I like Barth&#8217;s advice for Christians, except I, too, wouldn&#8217;t include the NY Times. The bible is supplmented by writings online and certain books. </p>
<p>But while active management of the information sources helps, it still doesn&#8217;t solve the larger problem. And I think the larger problem is here to stay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
